<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: File Fuzzing &#8211; Part 2</title>
	<atom:link href="http://anautonomouszone.com/blog/archives/14/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://anautonomouszone.com/blog/archives/14</link>
	<description>An autonomous zone to promote an exchange of ideas, skills, and experiences with computer (in)security.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2009 22:49:34 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Chuck B.</title>
		<link>http://anautonomouszone.com/blog/archives/14/comment-page-1#comment-18</link>
		<dc:creator>Chuck B.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2008 12:57:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://anautonomouszone.com/blog/?p=14#comment-18</guid>
		<description>Yeah - at the moment I&#039;m just using Autodafe to generate hex files for file fuzzing, and I haven&#039;t looked into the hex functionality for the debugging/weighting process...

However, if I were you I&#039;d hit up Martin (the author of Autodafe) via email (autodafe@vuagnoux.com) and ask him. He seemed pretty cool when I reached out to him. It did take a few days for him to respond though - I don&#039;t think he checks that email address every day.

Let me know the outcome, hopefully he&#039;ll release a newer version of Autodafe with some bug fixes - or even a windows version for the debugging /weighting process.

Cheers,

Chuck B.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah &#8211; at the moment I&#8217;m just using Autodafe to generate hex files for file fuzzing, and I haven&#8217;t looked into the hex functionality for the debugging/weighting process&#8230;</p>
<p>However, if I were you I&#8217;d hit up Martin (the author of Autodafe) via email (autodafe@vuagnoux.com) and ask him. He seemed pretty cool when I reached out to him. It did take a few days for him to respond though &#8211; I don&#8217;t think he checks that email address every day.</p>
<p>Let me know the outcome, hopefully he&#8217;ll release a newer version of Autodafe with some bug fixes &#8211; or even a windows version for the debugging /weighting process.</p>
<p>Cheers,</p>
<p>Chuck B.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Schlafwandler</title>
		<link>http://anautonomouszone.com/blog/archives/14/comment-page-1#comment-17</link>
		<dc:creator>Schlafwandler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2008 21:04:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://anautonomouszone.com/blog/?p=14#comment-17</guid>
		<description>Very interesting text &amp; thx for the autodafe extension. One question about this: The 0.1 version not only misses the hex generation feature, also hex values seem to be completely ingnored in the debugging/weighting process. Have you also looked into this or are you using autodafe just for the generation of testfiles?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very interesting text &amp; thx for the autodafe extension. One question about this: The 0.1 version not only misses the hex generation feature, also hex values seem to be completely ingnored in the debugging/weighting process. Have you also looked into this or are you using autodafe just for the generation of testfiles?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

